Dark energy interacting with dark matter

Notes on dark energy interacting with dark matter and unparticle in loop quantum cosmology

Mubasher Jamil, D. Momeni, Muneer A. Rashid

(Submitted on 8 Jul 2011 (v1), last revised 29 Jul 2011 (this version, v2))

We investigate the behavior of dark energy interacting with dark matter and unparticle in the framework of loop quantum cosmology. In four toy models, we study the interaction between the cosmic components by choosing different coupling functions representing the interaction. We found that there are only two attractor solutions namely dark energy dominated and dark matter dominated Universe. The other two models are unstable, as they predict either a dark energy filled Universe or one completely devoid of it.

Notes on dark energy interacting with dark matter and unparticle in loop quantum cosmology. (arXiv:1107.1558v1 [physics.gen-ph])

Measure Quantum Motions of 1 Femtometer

The femtometre (symbol fm) is an SI unit of length equal to 10⁻¹⁵ metres. This distance can also be called fermi and was so named in honour of Enrico Fermi and is often encountered in nuclear physics as a characteristic of this scale.

1 femtometre = 1.0 x 10⁻¹⁵ metres = 1 fermi = 0.001 picometre = 1000 attometres

1,000,000 femtometers = 1 nanometer.

For example, the diameter of a gold nucleus is approximately 8.45 femtometres.

In the video, Physicists Amir Safavi-Naeini and Oskar Painter describe how they were able to measure quantum motions of 1 femtometer (0.000000000000001 meters) in a micro-scale object.

Interesting reading:

Notes from Standford University: http://www.stanford.edu/~rsasaki/AP226/text4.pdf

arXiv preprints:

Mechanical systems in the quantum regime

Menno Poot, Herre S. J. van der Zant

Abstract

Mechanical systems are ideal candidates for studying quantum behavior of macroscopic objects. To this end, a mechanical resonator has to be cooled to its ground state and its position has to be measured with great accuracy. Currently, various routes to reach these goals are being explored. In this review, we discuss different techniques for sensitive position detection and we give an overview of the cooling techniques that are being employed. The latter include sideband cooling and active feedback cooling. The basic concepts that are important when measuring on mechanical systems with high accuracy and/or at very low temperatures, such as thermal and quantum noise, linear response theory, and backaction, are explained. From this, the quantum limit on linear position detection is obtained and the sensitivities that have been achieved in recent opto and nanoelectromechanical experiments are compared to this limit. The mechanical resonators that are used in the experiments range from meter-sized gravitational wave detectors to nanomechanical systems that can only be read out using mesoscopic devices such as single-electron transistors or superconducting quantum interference devices. A special class of nanomechanical systems are bottom-up fabricated carbon-based devices, which have very high frequencies and yet a large zero-point motion, making them ideal for reaching the quantum regime. The mechanics of some of the different mechanical systems at the nanoscale is studied. We conclude this review with an outlook of how state-of-the-art mechanical resonators can be improved to study quantum mechanics

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1106.2060.pdf

Quantum Nanomechanics

Pritiraj Mohanty

Abstract 

Quantum Nanomechanics is the emerging field which pertains to the mechanical behavior of nanoscale systems in the quantum domain. Unlike the conventional studies of vibration of molecules and phonons in solids, quantum nanomechanics is defined as the quantum behavior of the entire mechanical structure, including all of its constituents—the atoms, the molecules, the ions, the electrons as well as other excitations. The relevant degrees of freedom of the system are described by macroscopic variables and quantum mechanics in these variables is the essential aspect of quantum nanomechanics. In spite of its obvious importance, however, quantum nanomechanics still awaits proper and complete physical realization.

In this article, I provide a conceptual framework for defining quantum nanomechanical systems and their characteristic behaviors, and chart out possible avenues for the experimental realization of bona fide quantum nanomechanical systems.

http://nanoscience.bu.edu/papers/Mohanty%20-%20Book%20(2009).pdf

Neutrino's Saga - final chapter?

Time of flight difference between the speed of light and the arriving neutrinos. Observe a great difference between the two experiments. Now, we have to wait for the new results of the OPERA experiment, after the cable's problem.

The ICARUS experiment uploaded a paper to the arXiv website with a preprint paper about the neutrinos' velocity, in October 2011, defying the superluminal neutrinos. Now, after the assumption of a problem in a cable, by the OPERA team, ICARUS published a preprint paper that confirms the previous results that neutrinos doesn't travel with a speed superior that the speed of light. 

So, we have to wait for the OPERA results (we need a large number of events and it takes... days), to confirm that neutrinos aren't superluminal.

Here is the abstract:

Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the ICARUS detector at the CNGS beam

The CERN-SPS accelerator has been briefly operated in a new, lower intensity neutrino mode with ~10^12 p.o.t. /pulse and with a beam structure made of four LHC-like extractions, each with a narrow width of ~3 ns, separated by 524 ns. This very tightly bunched beam structure represents a substantial progress with respect to the ordinary operation of the CNGS beam, since it allows a very accurate time-of-flight measurement of neutrinos from CERN to LNGS on an event-to-event basis. The ICARUS T600 detector has collected 7 beam-associated events, consistent with the CNGS delivered neutrino flux of 2.2 10^16 p.o.t. and in agreement with the well known characteristics of neutrino events in the LAr-TPC. The time of flight difference between the speed of light and the arriving neutrino LAr-TPC events has been analysed. The result is compatible with the simultaneous arrival of all events with equal speed, the one of light. This is in a striking difference with the reported result of OPERA [1] that claimed that high energy neutrinos from CERN should arrive at LNGS about 60 ns earlier than expected from luminal speed. 

 Read more in DiscoverMagazine.com, CNet and Wired. 

Curved Paths

"Some problems founds in teaching physics related to curved paths that are unfortunately only described as illustration. A simple way to introduce the path is presented, which can help students to test their concept numerically. The procedure is limited into semi-circle and straight sub-paths. Smaller discretizing width $\Delta{}s$ gives better form of the produced path." (Sparisoma Viridi)

"A program called SCSPG (Semi-Circle Segmented Path Generator) is presented in this report. How it works is described and an example of it is illustrated using a case of work of friction along a curved path. As a benchmark for the program, work of friction along straight path is calculated and then compared to theoretical prediction." (Sparisoma Viridi, Siti Nurul Khotimah) 

Just remember the Physics Laws of Motion (video from Exam Fear Videos):

The neutrino's saga continues

Physicists wary of junking light speed limit yet
(AP) -- Physicists on the team that measured particles traveling faster than light said Friday they were as surprised as their skeptics about the results, which appear to violate the laws of nature as we know them.

"Going faster than light is something that is just not supposed to happen, according to Einstein's 1905 special theory of relativity. The speed of light - 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second) - has long been considered a cosmic speed limit.
The team [...] fired aneutrino beam 454 miles (730 kilometers) underground from Geneva to Italy.
They found it traveled 60 nanoseconds faster than light."

Read entire article here.

The paper in arXiv repository:

Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam 

OPERA 

(Submitted on 22 Sep 2011)

The OPERA neutrino experiment at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory has measured the velocity of neutrinos from the CERN CNGS beam over a baseline of about 730 km with much higher accuracy than previous studies conducted with accelerator neutrinos. The measurement is based on high-statistics data taken by OPERA in the years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Dedicated upgrades of the CNGS timing system and of the OPERA detector, as well as a high precision geodesy campaign for the measurement of the neutrino baseline, allowed reaching comparable systematic and statistical accuracies. An early arrival time of CNGS muon neutrinos with respect to the one computed assuming the speed of light in vacuum of (60.7 \pm 6.9 (stat.) \pm 7.4 (sys.)) ns was measured. This anomaly corresponds to a relative difference of the muon neutrino velocity with respect to the speed of light (v-c)/c = (2.48 \pm 0.28 (stat.) \pm 0.30 (sys.)) \times 10-5.

Subjects:	High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex)
Cite as:	arXiv:1109.4897v1 [hep-ex]