Follow eufisica

Follow eufisica

Showing posts with label 2010. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2010. Show all posts

Monday, December 20, 2010

Trapping antihydrogen

Amplify’d from blogs.physicstoday.org

Trapping antihydrogen

Are there any unexpected differences between matter and antimatter? The international ALPHA collaboration has taken an important step toward answering that question by constructing an apparatus at CERN that can confine freshly made atoms of antihydrogen, the bound state of an antiproton and a positron, for nearly 0.2 seconds—long enough for the antimatter to be examined spectroscopically. A hot plasma of roughly 104 antiprotons—produced by slamming 26-GeV protons into a metal target—is cooled and introduced into one end of the apparatus, while about 106 low-energy positrons from the decay of radioactive sodium are introduced into the other. Electric fields gently nudge the charged species together in the heart of the device, pictured here, where they mix at cryogenic temperatures and form antihydrogen. If their kinetic energies are low enough—in temperature units, less than 0.5 K—the antihydrogen atoms are held in the grip of a superconducting octupole magnet and solenoidal “mirror” coils that together interact with the atoms’ magnetic moments. When the magnetic fields are abruptly turned off, the atoms are released and their spatial distribution captured by a three-layer silicon detector, which locates the atoms’ annihilations and distinguishes them from events triggered by lone antiprotons and stray cosmic rays. In 335 trial runs, the researchers confirmed that 38 antihydrogen atoms had survived in the trap for at least 172 ms. Although the trapping rate per atom produced is low—about 10−5—the achievement sets the stage for precision spectroscopy and antihydrogen tests of fundamental symmetries and gravitation. (G. B. Andresen et al., Nature 468, 673, 2010.)—R. Mark Wilson
Read more at blogs.physicstoday.org

mobile version

I enabled the mobile version of my blog.
If you have problem when you type my address (eufisica.blogspot.com) use the following:
http://eufisica.blogspot.com/?m=1

Please, tell me if it works fine in your phone.

Friday, December 10, 2010

X particle

Image: Physicists paddle around the Super 
Kamiokande detector in a rubber raft as it fills 
with water. 

The detector was designed to hunt neutrinos 
and decaying protons, but could catch the 
signatures of Particle X. Credit: Kamioka 
Observatory, ICRR (Institute for Cosmic 
Ray Research),The University of Tokyo.
It seems something like the X-Files...
Scientists are proposing a new hypothetical particle that could solve two cosmic mysteries at once: what dark matter is made of, and why there’s enough matter for us to exist at all.
“We know you have to have these two ingredients to the universe, both atoms and dark matter,” said physicist Kris Sigurdson of the University of British Columbia, coauthor of a paper describing the new particle.
Some cosmologists are thinking that the same amount of matter and antimatter was created in the Big Bang, with particles and antiparticles immediately started colliding and extinguishing each other. But the fact that stars, planets exists is a proof that  wasn't happened.
“If matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts in the early universe, they would all have annihilated [each other],” said theoretical physicist Sean Tulin of the Canadian physics institute TRIUMF. “There has to be some asymmetry that was left over.”
Together with physicists Hooman Davoudiasl at Brookhaven National Lab and David Morrissey of TRIUMF, Tulin and Sigurdson suggest a way to solve the problem of missing antimatter: Hide it away as dark matter. The details are published in the Nov. 19 Physical Review Letters.
What we know about dark matter? Well, what we know about dark matter is that it is mysterious stuff that makes up a quarter of the energy density of the universe and refuses to interact with regular matter except through gravity.
The most popular candidate for dark matter is a theoretical weakly interacting massive particle, or WIMP, that connects only with the weak nuclear force and gravity, making it undetectable.
The new theoretical particle “is completely different from the WIMP idea,” Tulin said. The proposed particle, named simply “X,” has a separate antiparticle called “anti-X.” Equal amounts of X and anti-X were created in the Big Bang, and then decayed to lighter particles. Each X decayed into either a neutron or two dark-matter particles, called Y and Φ. Every anti-X converted to an anti-neutron or some anti-dark matter.
But the hypothetical X particle would rather decay into ordinary matter than dark matter, so it produced more neutrons than dark matter. Anti-X preferred decaying into anti-dark matter, and so produced more of it.
After all the particles and anti-particles that could find each other collided and eliminated each other, the universe was left with some extra neutrons and a corresponding number of extra anti-dark matter particles.
“The protons and neutrons can’t annihilate completely with their antiparticles, because there’s not enough to annihilate with,” Tulin said. “The same story happens in the hidden sector as well…. Some dark matter can’t annihilate with anything. So you’re left with some extra dark matter in the universe.”
Conveniently, this picture could explain another particle-physics puzzle: why there is only five times more dark matter than regular matter in the universe. To physicists, five is a really small number. If dark matter and regular matter didn’t spring from similar origins, there’s no reason why there should be roughly the same amount of both of them.
[...]
from: WIRED SCIENCE (follow the link for a full reading)

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Physics Front

An interesting site for physics teacher, provided by the American Association of Physics Teachers
Amplify’d from www.compadre.org
The Physics Front . org
The Physics Front provides high quality resources for the teaching of physics and physical sciences courses.
The Physics Front is a free service provided by the American Association of Physics Teachers in partnership with the NSF/NSDL.
See bellow for topics

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Antimatter: very important than you know!

blog_Ogame_Space_Ship2.jpeg
When you want to do something, it takes energy. Where does that energy come from? From the ATOMS!! and Molecules.

The Sun, rather than use chemical energy, relies on nuclear energy! [...]
How much more efficient? If I had a million pounds of hydrogen, and I fused the entire million pounds into helium, how much would turn into energy, and how much would turn into (helium) waste? I'd get about 7,000 poundsworth of energy (which, by E=mc2, is a lot, but I'd still get 993,000 pounds of waste. 0.7% efficiency isn't so great, all things considered.
idrogeno-anti.gifBut that's where antimatter comes in. [...] if I brought a million pounds of fuel on board -- 500,000 pounds of hydrogen and 500,000 pounds of antihydrogen -- I'd get perfect efficiency: 1,000,000 pounds worth of energy and no waste.
And that's why creating and trapping neutral anti-hydrogen is such a big deal!
[...], we can store an arbitrarily large amount of it for as long as we want.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Aurora Borealis - Norway 2010


Aurora Borealis timelapse HD - Tromsø 2010 from Tor Even Mathisen on Vimeo.

Airport Body Scanners: To Fear or Not to Fear?


It's that time of the year again - when Americans brace for the annual air travel melee on the industry's busiest day of the year - the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. New this year is the increased presence of total body scanners - technology developed to detect explosives stashed in the pants of a would-be terrorist - and the backlash of those who question the scanners' safety. How dangerous are the total body scanners, then?
There is disharmony between the government's official position on the scanners and some scientists' beliefs over the potential health hazards involved with a total body scan.
[...].
Both [nr: A backscatter X-ray unit (the gray and blue rectangular booth) or a millimeter wave unit (the gray cylindrical booth with clear windows] units work by firing a beam of radiation at the person being scanned. An image of the radiation that bounces back is created and viewed by a Transportation Safety Administration worker in another room. For both units, the TSA worker in the side room cannot see the person being scanned and workers operating the machine cannot see the images. If a suspicious item appears on the scan, the person then undergoes a thorough pat-down.
[...]

"We know that X-rays can damage DNA in cells, and we know that X-rays can ultimately produce cancer. So the concern is about the possibility of inducing X-ray-induced cancer in one of the individuals who's scanned," Brenner said in the interview.
The TSA says that the amount of radiation a person absorbs during a backscatter X-ray scan is equivalent to the same amount a person is exposed to over a period of two minutes when flying in an airplane at cruise altitude.
CBS medical correspondent Dr. Jennifer Ashton reported that if 1 billion people a year go through an X-ray scanner, 10 additional cancer deaths - a fraction of one percent - would result each year.
[...]
Looking at the images produced by the scanner, Peter Rez of Arizona State Univeristy estimates that the true amount is closer to one one-hundredth or even one fiftieth of a chest X-ray dose. The probability of death, he said, was closer to one in 20 million. While that's still a fraction of a percent, it is a higher risk than the risk of dying from a terrorist attack, which he put at one in 30 million.
[...]
Another group of scientists at the University of California, San Francisco, sent a letter to the President's science and technology adviser arguing that the X-ray scanner poses a greater risk than medical X-rays and the radiation absorbed during a flight. In those two cases, the radiation is distributed evenly throughout the body, the doctors say. The radiation from the scanners, however, is embedded in the skin, resulting in a higher concentration of radiation in a given area.
Questions remain including how the X-ray scanners will affect frequent flyers (including businessmen and flight attendants who could go through security anywhere from 200 to 400 times a year), children, pregnant women and travelers with weakened immune systems. There is also a question of what could happen should a machine get stuck or fail, potentially blasting one point on a person's body with excess X-ray radiation.
The good news about scanners: Millimeter wave scanners, which are also in use at airports around the country, use very far infrared waves, waves at the opposite end of the electromagnetic spectrum from the dangerous ionizing radiation of X-ray waves. X-rays are shorter waves that can penetrate the skin and alter DNA. Millimeter waves, by contrast, are longer waves that penetrate clothes but stop at the skin. The millimeter scan is akin to a heat lamp and is considered to be far safer than X-ray scanners.
[...]
One Congressman, Ron Paul of Texas, is sponsoring legislation to fight the new scanning requirements, arguing that the examinations are a violation of the fourth amendment protecting U.S. citizens from unreasonable search and seizure.
via physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com (follow the link to read full article)

Snaking Filament [HD Video]

Video about a Solar Flare.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

AntiHydrogen at CERN

"Physicists working at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva, Switzerland, have succeeded in trapping antihydrogen — the antimatter equivalent of the hydrogen atom — a milestone that could soon lead to experiments on a form of matter that disappeared mysteriously shortly after the birth of the universe 14 billion years ago.

An octupole magnet was critical to trapping antihydrogen atoms. A simple octupole magnetic field is produced by eight bar magnets in a plane with their north and south poles arrayed radially to create a magnetic minimum at the center. The antihydrogen atom is trapped in the center because of its magnetic moment, which itself is equivalent to a tiny bar magnet. The bar magnets above and below the octupole plane in this artist's rendition represent the mirror magnets that keep the atoms from squirting out the ends of the trap. (Katie Bertsche)
The first artificially produced low energy antihydrogen atoms — consisting of a positron, or antimatter electron, orbiting an antiproton nucleus — were created at CERN in 2002, but until now the atoms have struck normal matter and annihilated in a flash of gamma-rays within microseconds of creation."
image and text from berkeley.edu
FULL ARTICLE

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Baby Black Hole Discovered

Image: NASA

NASA said yesterday at a press conference that the Chandra space observatory appears to have found the youngest black hole yet found.The black hole should be a baby at the tender age of 30 years.

The Black Hole was formed after the "explosion" / implosion of a star in supernova, SN 1979C.The star had a mass 20 times greater than our Sun.The supernova was detected in 1979 in the galaxy M100, which is located 50 million light years away from Earth.

The Supernova actually took place some 50 million years ago, but as the light took that long to reach us, we only saw 30 years agoSo, looking for the same site now, we see what looks like a black hole young, 30 years - since we saw the supernova until today (actually, the black hole is 50 million years, but the "light "that surrounds it takes time to get to us).
More in NASADiscoveryUniverse TodayDvice, e o artigo científico.
Leiam em português, na Globo, AstroPT


Saturday, November 13, 2010

Edublog Awards 2010 - Nominations




My Nominations for The 2010 Edublog Awards are:
Best individual blog: All Physics
Best individual tweeter: eufisica
Best individual tweeter: Cornélia Castro
Best group blog: interatic
Best Resource sharing blog: Free Technology for Teachers
Most influential blog post: X-Rays day
Best teacher blog: Carlos Portela
Best teacher blog: eufisica
Best educational use of video / visual: Carlos Portela
Best educational use of a social network: eufisica
Best educational use of a social network: eufisica (FB fanpages)

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

First image from lead ions' collisions

First collisions of lead ions seen by the ALICE experiment on 07.11.2010 recorded by its innermost detector, the Inner Tracking System.
The shaded structures represent a perspective view of the detector elements. The lines are the reconstructed particle trajectories and the colour scale indicates the energy of the particles.

Such collisions produce an unprecedented number of particles, reaching thousands per collision.

Credits: ALICE experiment, CERN
More images: http://aliceinfo.cern.ch/Public/en/Chapter1/fhied.html

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Friday, November 5, 2010

Delayed launch of Discovery

Discovery launch was delayed until the end of November.


Credit: NASA's Kennedy Space Center
An 8-inch crack has been spotted in the foam covering the intertank section of the shuttle Discovery's external tank. Engineers are assessing that situation, which has developed since the tank was drained of its supercold propellants today.
Mission Management Team prelaunch chairman Mike Moses says officials determined it just wasn't prudent to push toward a Monday launch attempt given the amount of work ahead to resolve the hydrogen leak.
Moses says the foam crack is located on the front side of the tank facing the orbiter and just above the bipod where Discovery's nose is attached. He said it's too soon to know what might need to be done with that crack.
from spaceflightnow
image credits: NASA

Discovery Launch Livestram

Follow the comments on livestream, my twitter or facebook event.

watch live:

Watch live streaming video from spaceflightnow at livestream.com

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Comet Hartley 2


Comet Hartley 2 photo:
This close-up view of comet Hartley 2 was taken by NASA's EPOXI mission during its flyby of the comet on Nov. 4, 2010. It was captured by the spacecraft's Medium-Resolution Instrument. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UMD
11.04.10 -- NASA's EPOXI mission successfully flew by comet Hartley 2 at about 7 a.m. PDT (10 a.m. EDT) today, and the spacecraft has begun returning images. Hartley 2 is the fifth comet nucleus visited by a spacecraft.
from NASA

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Capturing the Atom Bomb on Film - Audio & Photos - NYTimes.com

Capturing the Atom Bomb on Film - Audio & Photos - NYTimes.com
"From 1945 to 1962, the United States military detonated hundreds of nuclear bombs in the atmosphere. George Yoshitake, 82, speaks about his experiences documenting the explosions and their destructive effects."
NYTimes

Featured Post

IBSE about Light Pollution

Here is my presentation that happened in the Discover the Cosmos Conference (Volos, Greece - 2013). The presentation was an Inquiry Base...

Twitter Updates

<- widget2 ->

Popular Posts